Filed/Served: Fresh 202302xx pdf A-A Statement of Claim (& online version with links to evidence of allegations) CV-23-91267
Snir‘s 202302xx Statement of Defense: Statement of Defense (& my EOMO Analysis)
(back to w-i-p court-enabled fraud as this Civil Action progresses)
Ottawa Police Services Board et al. (defendant/moving party)
Deirdre Moore (plaintiff/responding party)
|A.||Tests re: vexatious litigation
Case law has identified a number of common attributes of a vexatious litigant under including, but not limited to, the following:
|n/a||Gao v. Ontario WSIB, 2014 ONSC 6497 (CanLII)|
(a) Bringing multiple proceedings to try to re-determine an issue that has already been determined by a court of competent jurisdiction;
|There does not seem to be a competent jurisdiction available: this is the underlying problem. If Family court were competent in the first place, they would have been no … other … proceedings.
MASSIVE FRAUD against not only the targeted spouse but the taxpayers who pay the salaries of all dirty cops, crooked lawyers and bought judges.
|Re Lang Michener et al. and Fabian et al., 1987 CanLII 172 (ON SC) at pp. 5 and 6; Landmark Vehicle Leasing Corporation v. Marino, 2011 ONSC 1671 (CanLII), at para. 38.|
|(b) Rolling forward grounds and issues from prior proceedings to repeat and supplement them in later proceedings including bringing proceedings against counsel who have acted for or against them in earlier proceedings;||The syndicate is intertwined and explaining context/evidencing collusion is necessary to isolate specific grounds. Tricky without the ability to wire-tap, analyze bank accounts/credit card statements and obtain e-mail and phone records.|
|(c) Persistent pursuit of unsuccessful appeals;||Divisional dismissal #1 ignored federal paramountcy and Divisional dismissal #2 ignored obvious fraud … and committed more.|
|(d) Failure to pay costs awards of prior proceedings;||There wouldn’t be any cost awards but for the:
Also, Moore would be able to pay costs if she weren’t enduring so much fraud, theft and defamation regarding her mental health, lack of employment and denial of spousal support.
|(e) Bringing proceedings for a purpose other than the assertion of legitimate rights, including to harass or oppress others;||LOL. Classic D.A.R.V.O.|
|(f) Bringing proceedings where no reasonable person would expect to obtain the relief sought.||Any reasonable person unaware that Canada’s judicial system was a front for tax evasion and organized crime would have expected to win every proceeding that Moore has brought thus far. (see examples of laws judges break to reward perpetrators)|
|Is Moore vexatious? Or merely resilient: complete, intentional circumvention of the federal Divorce Act using multiple provincial acts and how they did it.|
|Is OPSB and the City of Ottawa malicious … with an unlimited budget … and a lot to hide?|